It is the same. If it can escape the allocation frame you need GC. > On Nov 15, 2020, at 7:34 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Aha, I forgot this fact. You are totally right. > > It is a bad example. A better example: is it possible to detect that some > values are always single-owner (and their out-of-reach time point are also > detectable)? > >> On Sunday, November 15, 2020 at 8:23:58 PM UTC-5 [email protected] wrote: >> I may be misunderstanding what you're suggesting, but I believe Go already >> tries to detect when a value can be placed on the stack. Then, it will be >> freed automatically when it falls out of scope. >> >>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 5:20 PM [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> For example, some local memory allocations could be detected no used >>> elsewhere so that they can may be freed immediately when out of reach >>> instead of waiting to be freed in the GC phase. >> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "golang-nuts" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to [email protected]. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/5c38b239-fe56-44ce-aaf6-61636a682707n%40googlegroups.com. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/7c7fcfde-14a3-4c6d-b53c-3c44f31d1568n%40googlegroups.com.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/B3E4D425-9458-4B05-89A6-15D91168D671%40ix.netcom.com.
