"Doesn't really need to be there" is highly subjective On Friday, August 28, 2020 at 7:10:45 PM UTC+2 Ashton Cummings wrote:
> My first impression of Go not having generics was negative. I came from > C#, Java, typescript, C++, and a few other languages that had generics. So, > learning Go and finding that it did not have it, was disappointing. 1 year > later and i am still using Go. However, my opinion has changed. I have > slowly adapted the Go mindset. Keep it simple. Go has this ability to just > keep things super simple. Easy to read and easy to implement. No overly > complicated designs, just simple code. I have really enjoyed working with > it. Adding generics to Go does not destroy that "keep it simple" mindset, > but i do believe it will add complexity to code that doesn't really need to > be there. > > I currently oppose it. However, i am open minded and can be convinced to > be happy about the change. Either way, i am still going to be using Go. =) > > -- > > -Ashton Cummings > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/63faf96a-c714-492d-a542-5aaeb5b177e0n%40googlegroups.com.
