On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 4:38 PM Frederik Zipp <[email protected]> wrote:
> The draft syntax for type lists is a comma separated list:
>
> type SignedInteger interface {
> type int, int8, int16, int32, int64
> }
>
> Wouldn't it be more consistent with existing Go syntax regarding types if it
> was a semicolon separated list in curly braces?
I don't think so. The type list in this case is syntactically just an
identifier list, i.e not a list containing possibly eg. type
literals/anonymous types.
And identifier lists are everywhere else comma separated.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAA40n-X2bFHTsKz7k1b3dspR_d_B5uPegEnxeEaDY5z5FB5Lfg%40mail.gmail.com.
