like java？i like it
在 2020年7月15日星期三 UTC+8上午6:31:55，Harald Weidner写道：
>
> Hello,
>
> > A typical computer keyboard provides four easily accessible pairs of
> > single-character symmetrical "brackets": parentheses ( and ), square
> > brackets [ and ], curly braces { and }, and angle brackets < and >. Go
> uses
> > curly braces to delineate code blocks, composite literals, and some
> > composite types, making it virtually impossible to use them for generics
> > without severe syntactic problems. Angle brackets require unbounded
> parser
> > look-ahead or type information in certain situations (see the end of
> this
> > e-mail for an example). This leaves us with parentheses and square
> > brackets.
>
> Another option would be the introduction of a new two-letter
> "bracket" operator, for example <: and :> . This could be parsed
> without symbol/type information and even without the "type" keyword.
>
> That said, I'm fine with any syntax. Thank you for your work on
> generics!
>
> Regards,
> Harald
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/c4954299-11d0-4227-b703-dd03d3f2d5aao%40googlegroups.com.
