Also big +1 from my side and kudos to Ian for always answering to this
storm of objections and suggestions with patience and objectiveness
Am Freitag, 19. Juni 2020 04:17:16 UTC+2 schrieb Michael Jones:
>
> I doubt this will help, but I have to try...
>
> Really smart and accomplished people have worked for a year to refine the
> generics approach--as the impressive updated design draft and the scholarly
> FeatherweightGo paper both demonstrate. The design is accompanied with
> tools to allow development and experience by any interested Go developer.
> This is marvelous. Thank you Go team and helpers!
>
> Let's post about substantial things in the design ("generic type switch
> necessary at day one" maybe, whatever) and not only about parenthesis. I'm
> going crazy here seeing all the comments about that. I mean, think of how
> hard they are working on this; parenthesis posts read like *More Cowbell *to
> me.
>
> Sorry for the outburst,
> Michael
>
> P.S. I challenge you to fully read the Featherweight Go paper and the
> design draft, as I did, and then come away thinking about the expression of
> the idea rather than the idea. I just can't comprehend it -- it is the
> ideas that hold power and beauty, that will transform our daily work.
>
> --
>
> *Michael T. [email protected] <javascript:>*
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/143db862-eb49-4ea1-aec6-6d23987b5e4ao%40googlegroups.com.
