I don't know how many of us are here, but I for one, really feels comfortable and familiar with use of parentheses.
I think anyone that is familiar with closures and functional programming would see it fitting, as if the generic function is a function that takes some type parameters and returns a function. It would be the way generic function work, if types are data in Go, imo. BTW, I think the fact that the new parentheses are never nested into other use of parentheses makes reading them much less confusing than supposed, but maybe that is just for me. And disclaimer: I do write common lisp codes as side hobbies, so take this with a grain of salt - I might developed some kind of adaption to parentheses that I am not aware of. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/0c10b780-0ebc-4467-97a3-c3603aaa9bf1o%40googlegroups.com.
