The creator:
Hi, I am extremely interested in and eager for golang's generics, and I
have read the updated draft.
https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/refs/heads/master/design/go2draft-type-parameters.md#acknowledgements
I think use "<>" to declare template's type would be more appropriate.
Original in the draft:
func Print(type T)(s []T) {
// same as above}
My opinions:
func Print<type T>(s []T) {
// same as above}
The reason:
1. More clear to discriminate and generics to normal funcs and type.
2. Use "<>" to declare type for generic code.
3. Use "()" to declare running params.
Wish you can give a thought to it.
hao
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CANGBPX4Gv7TOKMkT5DzCb_%3Drwpt4BjyHhEY76O8ShEB10BpgVg%40mail.gmail.com.
