On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 1:31 AM Cholerae Hu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Atomic.StoreX doesn't return the old value of the given pointer, so lock mov
> would work. Why do we use a xchg instead? It there any performance issue?
I assume that you are talking about Intel processors. Intel
processors do not have a lock mov instruction.
>From the Intel architecture manual:
The LOCK prefix can be prepended only to the following
instructions and only to those forms
of the instructions where the destination operand is a memory
operand: ADD, ADC, AND,
BTC, BTR, BTS, CMPXCHG, CMPXCH8B, DEC, INC, NEG, NOT, OR, SBB, SUB, XOR,
XADD, and XCHG.
Ian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAOyqgcXXxenESQFDBaAwu5-bfi8zfQBwMr8Jce4cMi3Phex9Hg%40mail.gmail.com.
