On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 9:48 PM Robert Engels <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think the OP was implying that GC is inefficient and was inquiring about > certain patterns of memory use could be freed more efficiently.
I see. I wouldn't worry about it, at least not without clear evidence of some problem. The cost of GC is very roughly proportional to the size of live memory. Actually freeing non-live memory is essentially, well, free. Ian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
