>
> A contract can also be written in terms of a struct:
>
> contract linkedListNode {
> X struct {
> next *X
> }
> }
>
>
In this example taken from the linked document; what is X?
On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 05:38:31 UTC+3, Burak Serdar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> A while ago I sent an email to this list proposing an alternative way
> to specify contracts using existing types, with a "like" keyword to
> represent contracts on primitives. The idea stirred up some
> discussion, I got some useful feedback, and eventually, it died down.
> The idea stuck with me though, because it wasn't complete when I
> proposed it, it had inconsistencies and unresolved problems. It turned
> into this puzzle that I kept working on on the side, I started writing
> a contracts/generics simulator, which I never finished, but it allowed
> me to figure out a way to solve the problems the original idea had. So
> the latest version of that proposal is now here:
>
> https://gist.github.com/bserdar/8f583d6e8df2bbec145912b66a8874b3
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
