Burak Serdar <[email protected]>:
> Instead of specifying the minimal set of operations a type should
> satisfy, why not describe what the type should look like:
I don't know if this can be followed through to a full proposal, but
I like the out-of-the-box thinking.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineering Institute: https://icei.org
Please visit their site and donate: the civilization you save might be your own.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
