Why such a vicious attack? This type of behavior against those exploring
generics in golang(i call Go this to spite the zealots) is a scourge gone
uncheck for too long. No need for comments to be speckled with demeaning
overtone.
On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 4:17:54 AM UTC-4, Florin Pățan wrote:
>
> Since everyone thinks it but nobody bothers to reply to it: this whole
> thing you propose can be currently done with a for loop, which not only is
> explicit about what it doing, but it also lets you control if you want to
> exit early from it and so on. Complicating the whole language because
> something is cool (yet looks like a really complex thing that you need to
> think about while reading the code) is in no one's benefit. Stop trying to
> avoid a couple of extra rows of for {} (where the third row is literally
> just an "}") and start embracing the fact that you can understand the code
> by looking at it and not apply any complex mental acrobatics to figure out
> what those three lines of code are doing. Your future self/person after you
> will thank you for that.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
