On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, at 11:39 AM, dc0d wrote:
> Is there any drawbacks if we put the CancelFunc of a cancellable > context.Context inside it's values? > > Problem: I needed a cross breed of WaitGroup and Context. So a > WaitGroup and it's CancelFunc is put inside it's values and are used > with some helper functions. I wrote a variant of WaitGroup - with some > needed features - but I see this pattern of accepting an argument like > "ctx context.Context" as the first argument in functions. So I though > it might be more idiomatic to use the Context instead. Any > thoughts/suggestions? Have a look at https://godoc.org/github.com/golang/sync/errgroup which seems to cover your use case Ian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
