On Tuesday, 4 October 2016 00:57:57 UTC+3, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi, > > I ll sleep on your code to digest it again. > > Yet agree i should not have these shared Registry, > and that your tree walk is way simpler. > > I may have some disagreements about 0 and 1, but it does not worth > mentioning, its all very contextual. >
Most of the time I end up using 0, because I usually want to auto-reload the code as well, not just the templates. Now 1. is trivial to setup and the overhead for dev environment isn't a problem. Of course, if necessary at a future date -- you can migrate from that 1. to any of the more complex solution, when the need arises... I agree that 2-4 are nicer solutions, but a lot of times, they are not worth the effort. thanks! > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
