Have you considered using a sync.WaitGroup?
John
John Souvestre - New Orleans LA
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Evan Digby
Sent: 2016 September 13, Tue 13:56
To: golang-nuts
Subject: [go-nuts] Having difficulty testing this "cleanly"
Has anyone come across a good way, non-racy way to ensure that N tasks are
guaranteed to be completed after a function is called? Essentially I have a
“Close” function that must be guaranteed to block until all tasks are finished.
Achieving this was pretty simple: wrap each task in an RLock, and then a Lock
on close.
Example: https://play.golang.org/p/7lhBPUhkUE
Now I want to write a solid test to guarantee Close will meet that requirement
of all tasks must finish first for posterity. In that example, try commenting
out the RLock/RUnlock on lines 25/26. You'll see that it no longer outputs
many, if any, lines. I'm trying to prevent that from happening in the future by
some cowboy refactor!
All of the ways I can come up with involve Sleeping or launching more tasks
than I _think_ can be finished in time--obviously not good!
I feel like I must be missing some obvious way to test this and I'll end up
feeling silly once someone replies with the solution. I'm okay with that!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
