On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Fred Kiefer <[email protected]> wrote: > On 09.06.2011 01:22, Gregory Casamento wrote: >> >> Just a quick thought.... >> >> I'm wondering if we shouldn't consider using icns as the default for >> icons. Once the icns implementation is completed it should, in >> theory, adjust to the optimal resolution for the given size. > > Not sure what the benefit would be. The tiff format can also hold multiple > images at once and the tiff library we use is more common than the icns one. > And our own icns loading code is rather incomplete. I should know that > having written most of it.
Gimp for instance doesn't support multiple layer tiff. Krita seems to do that though. Can't we just use/invent any format that pack a set of images in tar.gz and also a plist? Let's make them have .wtf extensions. -- .----. Bluna Ratimonkey /.../\...\ 漫画家 |.../ \...| http://qstx.blogspot.com (Free Software Advocacy & Development) |../ \..| http://feedbat.blogspot.com (Studio Work For Hire) \/ \/ http://groundzerostudiocomplex.blogspot.com (Studio Research) _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
