On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 06:10:18PM +0200, C. Menge wrote: > Nope. The only entries in tag.cache.update are those of the directories > I explicitly browsed. Other new directories are properly shown in the > list - but their content is not accessed (and their information is *not* > added to ...cache) without the user visiting the single file list of the > respective directory.
Ah, I get what you're talking about. No, there's no "automatic" traversal of directories marked as new, and that is intentional. Granted, it is technically feasible, but quite a PITA and we're better off just scheduling a cron job to run the master indexer. When we re-generate the database, it does a full filesystem traversal. Otherwise it just adds new things as they are requested to speed things up at runtime. - Solomon -- Solomon Peachy ICQ: 1318344 Melbourne, FL JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
pgpy10EjSIKbG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnump3d-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnump3d-users
