Hi, On Tuesday, November 12, 2019 3:39:00 PM EET دانیال بهزادی wrote: > There is not only Freedom concerns about the future of Linux, but also > technical and practical concerns about a monolithic kernel in the age of > IoT. We need a Free Software kernel to power supercomputers, nanocomputers > and anything between. That's one of my points. microkernel is a way more advanced design, yep, but it's the same way harder to design and implement. And from technical point of view GNU Hurd design isn't so nice ... > در November 12, 2019 8:53:42 AM UTC، Jean Louis <[email protected]> نوشت: > >* Alexander Vdolainen <[email protected]> [2019-11-12 14:14]: > >> however, if we're going to speak about GNU system we're limited with > > > >a few > > > >> components: > >> - GNU userland - ok it exists > >> - GNU toolchain - yep it works > >> - GNU kernel/system services - ... nope > >> > >> I know linux kernel just works, but it's not a GNU project. > > > >Software need not be GNU project to be part of GNU. A purely GNU > >system includes, by definition, non-GNU packages: > >https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-misc-discuss/2019-11/msg00356.html > >https://www.gnu.org/gnu/manifesto.html > > > >Quote from GNU Manifesto: > > > >"When the kernel and compiler are finished, it will be possible to > >distribute a GNU system suitable for program development. We will use > >TeX as our text formatter, but an nroff is being worked on. We will > >use the free, portable X Window System as well." > > > >GNU/Linux-libre is GNU project. Please see: > >https://www.gnu.org/s/linux-libre > > > >Thus GNU has the kernel Linux-libre, and Hurd, and other kernels could > >become GNU project. > > > >GNU system was not envisioned to be purely GNU system from its > >inception. > > > >Jean > > ارسال از دستگاه اندرویدم با نامه ک-9. لطفاً کوتاهی متن را ببخشید
-- Alexander Vdolainen, The evil contractor.
