[email protected] (Aurélien DESBRIÈRES) writes: > Richard Stallman <[email protected]> writes: > >> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] >> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] >> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] >> >> > > Why smartphones in particular?... >> >> > Because that's what everybody is buying these days >> >> Not everybody. I value my freedom too much to carry >> any portable phone. >> >> Of course, we want to provide free software to run >> on the main processor of portable phones. If people >> are going to use them, we should help them get as close >> to freedom as the products permit. But that is not close >> enough, and there's no plausible way we can correct that. >> So we should make sure that distributing free software for >> them does not appear to legitimize them. > > 'as close to freedom as the products permit' > > In an electricity network, there is no more freedom, everything can be > spy from the fact they could now know if you are watching tv or anything > else. (That is part of the reason they want to know who could help them > to secure it, to know who is able to do same) > > > 'legetimize them' > > Could you kill a GNU? > That is the same as could the FSF or GNU could legetimize one days the > rape of the Universal Declaration of Human Right and its article on > Privacy? > > . The preamble > . Article 2 > . Article 12 > . Article 13 > . Article 18 > . Article 19 > . Article 20 > . Article 26 > . Article 28 > . Article 29 > . Article 30 > > All of that is rape nowdays in front freedom arround computing, > electronical and electical form off tools (The Internet of Things) > > But as far as I know (and I don't know very far) I have never hear you, > GNU or the FSF legetimize these sort of rape. > > People at the FSF and arround every project bring their best to reach > their own counsciousness of freedom. > > The rest, have been be raped by some people who have been be erected and > not elected by the rape of democracy itself. > > Lot of people try to prevent and protect freedom in history, but they > were more free than we are nowadays. > > "Those who give up their liberty for more security neither deserve > liberty nor security." BF > > Where is the security in this world when some man who works for the > "biggest" democracy are ready to make you disappear in torture ways for > there pleasure if they wish, just because you think they are bad boys. > > No, I don't think, but it is right that I have not read the inverse on > all that fact that the FSF, GNU or you legitimate all of that could be > considered by some people as 'bad'.
By some other, as not enought, in the dystopian world they are working on. <#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign> -- Aurelien Desbrieres We are Human at level 0, we are poor.
