() [email protected] (Karl Berry) () Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:37:10 GMT These days, as I keep repeating to no apparent effect another viable -- as far as I can see, the best -- approach is use the Texinfo XML output as your input.
Perhaps people resist XML, no matter its viability, because it is ugly. This XML is an essentially complete representation of the input, but without the Texinfo syntax and option peculiarities, as described above. It would be cool if Texinfo were able to produce SXML, a format directly translatable to/from XML, directly. More info: http://pobox.com/~oleg/ftp/Scheme/SXML.html which says, in the intro paragraph: SXML is an abstract syntax tree of an XML document. SXML is also a concrete representation of the XML Infoset in the form of S-expressions. SXML retains expressiveness and is not (as) ugly. If Texinfo were to output SXML, uptake amongst Lisp and Scheme programmers would quicken. I believe the GNU system would benefit greatly as a result. -- Thien-Thi Nguyen ..................................... GPG key: 4C807502 . NB: ttn at glug dot org is not me . . (and has not been since 2007 or so) . . ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES . ........... please send technical questions to mailing lists ...........
pgpUySxeOXdVc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
