On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 17:19:47 +0200 "Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that even #gnu looks like a best option for the GNU system > channel than ##hurd, other names i think it'd be good to use: > #gnu-sys , #gnu-system, #gnusystem. > > #gnu-devel already exists, and #gnu is also good, so is ##hurd. > Since the package system is tightly integrated with, and is a part of, the Hurd I think ##hurd is pretty ok. If we suddenly find ourselves in the luxurious position of being swamped with eager package maintainers, then we it would be time to rethink whatever the packaging project needs its own channel. But until such good fortune arises, it is just more convenient to have two overlapping projects in the same space. At least that's my two cent opinion. ~Anders _______________________________________________ gnu-system-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-system-discuss
