Richard M. Stallman wrote:
I can't imagin why someone would want to write a translator in scheme for example, but being able to interact with translators is far more plausible (setting translators on a node, removing, getting information about them, etc).If it makes sense to write translators in Perl or Ruby, it makes sense to write them in Scheme. I only wonder whether it will run fast enough to be useful.
Last time i ran a scheme (little) program from GNU/Hurd, the speed was very good. I don't think it'd be too much of a concern. And since we are using Guile, it'd be easy to combine the code with critical C code. _______________________________________________ gnu-system-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-system-discuss
