David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > Hyman Rosen wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/13/2010 2:22 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> >> > Copies lawfully made fall under 17 USC 109
> >>
> >> Certainly.
> >
> > Right, to wit:
> >
> > http://www.terekhov.de/Samsung-Answer.pdf
> >
> > "As a separate and distinct Twelfth Affirmative Defense and each
> > claim for relief alleged therein, Defendant alleges that Plaintiffsâ
> > claim for copyright infringement is barred under at least the
> > provisions of 17 U.S.C. § 109(a), as Defendant was licensed and any
> > copies alleged to be infringing were, therefore, lawfully made. "
>
> You really have to stop confusing the arguments of either party as being
> legally relevant before the court says so.
Samsung listed TWENTY (20) legally relevant reasons why SFLC's complaint
is legally irrelevant, silly.
regards,
alexander.
P.S. "Every computer program in the world, BusyBox included, exceeds the
originality standards required by copyright law."
Hyman Rosen <[email protected]> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'
P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."
Hyman Rosen <[email protected]> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
