GNU-Crypto's web page and messages on gnu-crypto-discuss say the
license is gpl-with-exception, but the COPYING file in the distribution says
gpl.
I checked the source:
#!/bin/sh
javafiles=`find . -name "*.java"`
for f in $javafiles; do
if grep -qi "As a special exception, the copyright holders" $f ; then
echo -n gpl-with-exception
elif grep -qi "GNU General Public License" $f ; then
echo -n gpl
elif grep -qi "Legion Of The Bouncy Castle" $f ; then
echo -n "bouncy castle"
else
echo -n unknown
fi
echo " license:" $f
done
It looks like the licenses are gpl-with-exception, or the bouncy castle
license which is compatible, except for
source/gnu/testlet/config.java
source/gnu/testlet/Testlet.java
source/gnu/testlet/SimpleTestHarness.java
source/gnu/testlet/TestHarness.java
source/gnu/testlet/ResourceNotFoundException.java
which are gpl, and
jce/javax/crypto/NullCipher.java
which has no license, or copyright notice for that matter.
I'm assuming the non-source files are gpl since that's what COPYING says.
Is this right?
Doug
______________________________________________________________________
Get your privacy back with free email envelopes at TigerPrivacy.com.
Tiger Envelopes warning: Anyone could read this message. Sent as a postcard at
2005-02-12 19:58:16.341 UTC.
_______________________________________________
gnu-crypto-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-crypto-discuss
