Hi Paul, There's a discussion on the new format here that might be helpful: https://gitlab.onelab.info/gmsh/gmsh/-/issues/444
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:02 AM paul francedixhuit <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All > I'm currently having a look to the new 4.1 gmsh format. > > Compared to the previous 2.2 legacy one: > > - I guess *$Nodes* and *$Elements* for example use now blocs (or it > has been splitted in blocs) in order to take advantages of parallelization, > hasn't it? > - *$Entities* and *$PhysicalNames* are used to define specific groups > of elements to apply on specific features (typically sub-parts) > > Nonetheless concerning *$NodeData* (and *$ElementNodeData*), I've not > tested it so far but I feel the structure remains identical to the 2.2 one: > am I right? if so I can imagine improvements will be provided in a next > future, won't be? > > The next steps will be to use it through the Python API 😊 > > Bye > > Paul > _______________________________________________ > gmsh mailing list > [email protected] > http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh > -- Max Orok Contractor www.mevex.com
_______________________________________________ gmsh mailing list [email protected] http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
