Le 03/01/2013 17:54, Gustav González a écrit :
From my point of view, GLPI should be the application killer of
Aranda, but not as a hard
copy of it, but as solution that can be customized in an easy way
to replace it.
I'll expect to share with you all the changes/patches/plugins or
whatever I have to do to
achieve my goal, and of course, you'll decide what you want to
include or not for the future
versions of GLPI, finally it's your decision.
The only thing I really care about it, it's that reconsider your
politics about what requirements
should be included as part of the main core of GLPI.
Hi,
GLPI is free software and therefore faces two constraints:
- The number of features added to each version depends on the available
energy
- Users request features (technical or functional) and the project
attempts to answer as soon as possible
Currently, the available energy is not sufficient and we have to make
choices. These choices are certainly debatable but we assume.
If we can not respond quickly to a request, we try to give you a workaround.
We are also completely open to any contribution, if you have a need that
we can not respond quickly, you can implement and offer, we usually
integrate all constructive proposals(ex : new waiting state)
Indeed, the use of a template engine is not currently used for priority
for us because adaptation for GLPI is not optimal in the current state
of GLPI and . We started working on the heart of GLPI for the use of
such an engine is interesting and its adaptation is simple and fast.
Currently, the graphic adaptation is done quite simply by changing only
the CSS. If there are problematic elements at this level, just tell us.
Regards,
Julien
_______________________________________________
Glpi-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/glpi-dev
