On Nov 17, 4:37 pm, trans <[email protected]> wrote: > (Quite honestly, if it wasn't for grancher I would not be using > github's website features at all, and I may not have even bothered > switching to github b/c of it). Unfortunately, grancher does not work > on Ruby 1.9+ yet and the author seems to have forgotten about it :-(
I wonder if you could checkout the other branch as a submodule or something. Can that actually be done? I also wonder why the separate branch offends you so much that you can't use the service because of the way its shaped. Oh noes, it's not how I would have done it, so I can't use it at all. Really? Personally, I like the way it works now. Why on earth would you want to pollute your dev files with generated html and/or website content? For pages with binary files, I find I'm frequently tempted wreck the history and do a force push to save some space. That'd be pretty irritating for people that already pulled it if it was sitting in the HEAD, ya know? So, if the sub directory thing is ever actually implemented, I hope they leave the gh-pages method alone. It's better. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GitHub" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/github?hl=en.
