github  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] feat: monotonically sortable job ids [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: monotonically sortable job ids [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pluggable job generator [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pluggable job id generator [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pluggable job id generator [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pluggable job id generator [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pluggable job id generator [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pluggable job id generator [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pluggable job id generator [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pluggable job id generator [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pluggable job id generator [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: pluggable job id generator [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: document Web TUI [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [I] Store job event logs in an object store so history survives the scheduler [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Escape closing brackets in bracket-quoted identifiers [datafusion-sqlparser-rs] via GitHub
• [I] Web TUI has not been mentioned anywhere [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Web TUI has not been mentioned anywhere [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Web TUI has not been mentioned anywhere [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/init from 4.36.2 to 4.37.6 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/init from 4.36.2 to 4.37.6 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/init from 4.36.2 to 4.37.6 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/init from 4.36.2 to 4.37.4 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/init from 4.36.2 to 4.37.4 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/analyze from 4.36.2 to 4.37.6 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/analyze from 4.36.2 to 4.37.6 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/analyze from 4.36.2 to 4.37.6 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/analyze from 4.36.2 to 4.37.4 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump github/codeql-action/analyze from 4.36.2 to 4.37.4 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [PR] Fixed where binary expressions were passed in the wrong order when the null directions differed [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: consider nulls_first when propagating ordered SortProperties [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: consider nulls_first when propagating ordered SortProperties [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: consider nulls_first when propagating ordered SortProperties [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: consider nulls_first when propagating ordered SortProperties [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: consider nulls_first when propagating ordered SortProperties [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: consider nulls_first when propagating ordered SortProperties [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] perf: optimize string contains function [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• [I] SortProperties::and_or claims orderings that Kleene AND/OR do not preserve [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] SortProperties::and_or claims orderings that Kleene AND/OR do not preserve [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: re-enable null-equal join dynamic filters with an IS NULL predicate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: re-enable null-equal join dynamic filters with an IS NULL predicate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: re-enable null-equal join dynamic filters with an IS NULL predicate [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: re-enable null-equal join dynamic filters with an IS NULL predicate [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(proto): preserve AggregateExec schema and reversed state [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(proto): preserve AggregateExec schema and reversed state [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(proto): preserve AggregateExec schema and reversed state [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(proto): preserve AggregateExec schema and reversed state [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] Restore the From / TryFrom proto conversions dropped since 54.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore the From / TryFrom proto conversions dropped since 54.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore the From / TryFrom proto conversions dropped since 54.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore the From / TryFrom proto conversions dropped since 54.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore the From / TryFrom proto conversions dropped since 54.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore the From / TryFrom proto conversions dropped since 54.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore the From / TryFrom proto conversions dropped since 54.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore the From / TryFrom proto conversions dropped since 54.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore the From / TryFrom proto conversions dropped since 54.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restore the From / TryFrom proto conversions dropped since 54.1.0 [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump the all-other-cargo-deps group across 1 directory with 10 updates [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(deps): bump the all-other-cargo-deps group across 1 directory with 10 updates [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Grouped approx_distinct can overflow Arrow BinaryArray state offsets [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Grouped approx_distinct can overflow Arrow BinaryArray state offsets [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Perf: remove extra allocations for hex operations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Perf: remove extra allocations for hex operations [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Perf: remove extra allocations for hex operations [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Optimize take_n on DictionaryGroupValuesColumn<K> [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimize take_n on DictionaryGroupValuesColumn<K> [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimize take_n on DictionaryGroupValuesColumn<K> [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: [branch-1.0] backport four bug fixes for 1.0.1 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: [branch-1.0] backport four bug fixes for 1.0.1 [datafusion-comet] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Ballista 54.1.0 Release [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• [PR] Add Ballista 54.1.0 release announcement blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Ballista 54.1.0 release announcement blog post [datafusion-site] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Propagation of ordered `SortProperties` should consider `nulls_first` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Propagation of ordered `SortProperties` should consider `nulls_first` [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Propagation of ordered `SortProperties` should consider `nulls_first` [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): add the history server [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Reduce per-file metadata overhead for wide-schema parquet scans [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce per-file metadata overhead for wide-schema parquet scans [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Release DataFusion `55.0.0` (Jul / Aug 2026) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore(proto): deprecate `AsyncFuncExec::async_exprs`, which only existed for proto serialization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(proto): deprecate `AsyncFuncExec::async_exprs`, which only existed for proto serialization [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [EPIC] Merge EnforceDistribution + EnforceSorting into a single EnsureRequirements rule for correctness and idempotency [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [EPIC] Merge EnforceDistribution + EnforceSorting into a single EnsureRequirements rule for correctness and idempotency [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat(scheduler): record a per-job event log behind --event-log-dir [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): record a per-job event log behind --event-log-dir [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): record a per-job event log behind --event-log-dir [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): record a per-job event log behind --event-log-dir [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): record a per-job event log behind --event-log-dir [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): record a per-job event log behind --event-log-dir [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(scheduler): record a per-job event log behind --event-log-dir [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [I] PyLimit (LogicalPlan Limit node) has no way to read skip/fetch — regressed in #905 [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [I] Add wrapper classes for Expression types [datafusion-python] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: reject max_buffered_batches_per_output_file values below 2 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: reject max_buffered_batches_per_output_file values below 2 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: reject max_buffered_batches_per_output_file values below 2 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: reject max_buffered_batches_per_output_file values below 2 [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: reject max_buffered_batches_per_output_file values below 2 [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] chore(proto): deprecate accessors that only existed for proto serialization [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore(proto): deprecate accessors that only existed for proto serialization [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] Inconsistent Explain units [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Inconsistent Explain units [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Inconsistent Explain units [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat(proto): support expressions in LIMIT skip and fetch [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat(proto): support expressions in LIMIT skip and fetch [datafusion] via GitHub
• [I] `AggregateExec` physical-plan serde rebuilds the output schema, losing optimizer-preserved field names (and `is_reversed`) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `AggregateExec` physical-plan serde rebuilds the output schema, losing optimizer-preserved field names (and `is_reversed`) [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] `AggregateExec` physical-plan serde rebuilds the output schema, losing optimizer-preserved field names (and `is_reversed`) [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] feat: add extension to support `DataFrame::checkpoint()` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add extension to support `DataFrame::checkpoint()` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add extension to support `DataFrame::checkpoint()` [datafusion-ballista] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Select with order by from empty table triggers SanityCheckPlan error [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] fix: preserve input ordering required by limits [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: preserve input ordering required by limits [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Fail to merge schema field for partitioned table with dict [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fail to merge schema field for partitioned table with dict [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: add literal constraints to type signatures [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add literal constraints to type signatures [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add literal constraints to type signatures [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add literal constraints to type signatures [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [Bug] next_day returns NULL for far-future start dates where Spark returns a value [datafusion] via GitHub
• [PR] fix: scope information schema to catalog [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: scope information schema to catalog [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix: scope information schema to catalog [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] IN LIST: reuse primitive filters for FixedSizeBinary [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] IN LIST: add keyed frozen set for large primitive lists [datafusion] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] IN LIST: optimize Utf8View and BinaryView filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: optimize Utf8View and BinaryView filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: optimize Utf8View and BinaryView filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: optimize Utf8View and BinaryView filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: optimize Utf8View and BinaryView filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: optimize Utf8View and BinaryView filters [datafusion] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IN LIST: optimize Utf8View and BinaryView filters [datafusion] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages