andygrove commented on PR #6085:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/6085#issuecomment-5778788334

   The reasoning on dropping the planning force holds up. 
`postDriverMetricUpdates` returns without reading any metric value when the 
execution id is null, so the force really does disappear in that case, but 
`findAllPlanData` calls `ensureSubqueriesResolved()` immediately before and 
reads `commonData` immediately after, so the ordering survives on the fused 
path, and the standalone path needs the partition data anyway.
   
   One gap. The double-post guard is the substance of this change and I do not 
think anything fails if it is removed. The two new cases cover one call site 
each, and the paths are mutually exclusive for a given scan as you say, so 
neither posts twice. The count assertions are `.trim != "0"`, which a doubled 
value passes just as well as a correct one.
   
   You already have the number that would catch it, from the spark-shell run in 
the description: `resultDataFiles=16, not 32`. Could 
`assertPlanningMetricsInUi` assert the exact expected `resultDataFiles` and 
`totalDataManifest` for the fixture table instead of just non-zero? That turns 
the manual check into a regression test. Calling `scan.sendDriverMetrics()` a 
second time before reading the store would be the more direct version if the 
exact counts are awkward to pin down.
   
   Also worth a word in the comment that `postedExecutionId` is per scan 
instance. Two instances of the same scan under one execution id would still 
post twice, since `copy()` does not carry the field. Probably not reachable 
today, but the comment currently reads as though the whole execution is covered.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to