jensholdgaard commented on PR #24770:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/24770#issuecomment-5468266777

   The `cargo test (amd64)` failure was real and pointed at a scoping problem 
in my first push — fixed in the update.
   
   The nine failing `evolved_schema*` / `test_pushdown_with_missing_*` tests 
exercise the *other* path that substitutes NULL for a column: files missing the 
column entirely (schema evolution). My original check keyed only on "the 
simplified predicate is a constant NULL/false literal", so it also fired there, 
pruning row groups those tests expect to see in the raw scan output and 
shifting their pushdown metric counts. Semantically that pruning would be sound 
too (a file missing `c2` cannot satisfy `c2 = 2`), but it is a behaviour change 
well beyond the regression this PR fixes, and partition-value-driven collapse 
is similarly already `FilePruner`'s territory.
   
   The update narrows the skip with a `stats_constants_in_predicate` guard: the 
collapse only counts as statistics-proven when the original predicate 
referenced a column that `constant_columns_from_stats` proved constant for this 
file. With that:
   
   - the nine previously failing tests pass again unchanged,
   - the new regression test still fails without the fix and passes with it,
   - `cargo test -p datafusion-datasource-parquet --lib opener::` — 47 passed,
   - `cargo test -p datafusion --lib datasource::physical_plan::parquet::tests` 
— 35 passed (the 4 `parquet_exec_with_*` failures on my machine reproduce on an 
untouched checkout and pass in CI, so they are environmental).
   
   If maintainers would rather generalise the skip to the missing-column 
collapse as well, I'm happy to do that in a follow-up with the corresponding 
test updates — it just seemed wrong to smuggle a second behaviour change into a 
targeted regression fix.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to