Rich-T-kid opened a new issue, #21878:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/21878

   ### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
   
   [#21765](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/21765) introduced 
GroupValuesDictionary, a specialized GroupValues implementation that operates 
directly on the structure of a single dictionary-encoded column during hash 
aggregation. Rather than deserializing dictionary arrays into a generic 
row-based format (as GroupValuesRows does), it exploits the inherently 
low-cardinality nature of dictionary arrays, maintaining a mapping of unique 
value hashes to group IDs so that repeated values are resolved in O(1) after 
the first encounter.
   That optimization is limited to the single-column dictionary case. When a 
query groups by two or more columns, DataFusion falls back to GroupValuesRows, 
which serializes all columns regardless of their types, discarding the 
dictionary encoding properties entirely.
   Real-world workloads frequently group by multiple low-cardinality string or 
categorical columns (e.g., _GROUP BY country, product_category, status_). These 
columns are natural candidates for dictionary encoding, and the combination of 
columns still has bounded cardinality, making the same key-caching insight from 
#21765 applicable at the multi-column level.
   
   ### Describe the solution you'd like
   
   Extend the dictionary grouping optimization introduced in #21765 to handle 
the case of 2+ dictionary-encoded group keys, introducing a multi-column 
GroupValuesDictionary path (or equivalent) in new_group_values. The approach 
will work solely on batches where all group-key columns are dictionary arrays, 
**mixed dictionary + non-dictionary group keys will fall back to 
GroupValuesRows** as before and are out of scope for this issue.
   The implementation will mirror the strategy from #21765: exploit the compact 
dictionary representation across multiple columns to avoid redundant 
serialization and re-hashing of repeated value combinations.
   
   1. Implement the multi-column dictionary grouping path
     - Validate that there are no correctness regressions relative to 
GroupValuesRows
   2. Build dedicated benchmarks comparing the new path against GroupValuesRows 
across multiple axes:   
     - Cardinality (low / medium / high number of unique group combinations)
     - Null frequency
     - Batch size
     - Number of group-key columns
   3. Confirm a meaningful performance improvement before merging
   
   ### Describe alternatives you've considered
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Additional context
   
   This is a follow-up to 
[#21765](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/21765) and continues 
progress toward [#7000](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/7000) and 
[#7647](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/7647).
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to