viirya opened a new pull request, #21833:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/21833

   ## Which issue does this PR close?
   
   <!--
   We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and 
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases. You can 
link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example `Closes #123` 
indicates that this PR will close issue #123.
   -->
   
   - Closes #.
   
   ## Rationale for this change
   
   <!--
    Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly in 
the issue then this section is not needed.
    Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand your 
changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.  
   -->
   
   ## What changes are included in this PR?
   
   Previously RIGHT/FULL/RIGHT SEMI/RIGHT ANTI/RIGHT MARK joins were excluded 
from the memory-limited (multi-pass) fallback path because they need to track 
which right rows have been matched across all left chunks. They would OOM 
instead of spilling.
   
   Now all join types support the fallback:
   
   - A global right bitmap (Vec<BooleanBuffer>, indexed by right batch sequence 
number) accumulates matches across all left chunk passes. 
ReplayableStreamSource guarantees consistent batch boundaries across passes, so 
batch sequence numbers are stable.
   
   - In memory-limited mode, EmitRightUnmatched merges the current batch's 
bitmap into the global accumulator (bitwise OR) instead of emitting unmatched 
rows immediately.
   
   - After the last left chunk, a new state EmitGlobalRightUnmatched replays 
the right side one more time and uses the accumulated bitmap to emit unmatched 
right rows correctly.
   
   Single-pass behavior is unchanged: the global bitmap path is only active 
when is_memory_limited() is true.
   
   Co-authored-by: Claude Code
   
   ## Are these changes tested?
   
   <!--
   We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
   1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
   2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code
   
   If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example, are 
they covered by existing tests)?
   -->
   
   Unit tests and e2e tests
   
   ## Are there any user-facing changes?
   
   <!--
   If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be 
updated before approving the PR.
   -->
   
   <!--
   If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please add the `api 
change` label.
   -->
   
   No
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to