Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy  <pclo...@gmail.com> writes:

> The first patch was from a long time ago. The concern was it may be
> breaking existing user expectation [1]. I still maintain that it's a good
> thing to do and should not break anything. Hence the resubmission.

I do not think "it's a good feature to have" was a question from the
beginning.  Thread [1] stopped with me saying "as long as >(N) can
be used as Duy claims as a workaround to get the original behaviour,
it is good to allow using >|(N) for this new output format; I didn't
check if >(N) does behave that way, though".  What was necessary to
resurrect the patch was "Yes, >(N) can be used that way and here is
a test" or something like that.

> The second patch adds negative column specifier to >|() and friends.
> A positive number 'n' specifies the n-th column from the left border
> of the screen, '-n' specifies the n-th column from the _right_ border.

That is quite nice enhancement.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to