Torsten Bögershausen <tbo...@web.de> writes:
> May a simple
> printf "1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\n9\n10\n"
>
> be an option ?
If you were to do that, at least have the decency to make it more
readable by doing something like:
printf "%s\n" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
;-)
But as I said, as a response to "t6044 broken on pu" bug report,
s/seq/test_seq/ is the only sensible change.
Improving "test_seq, the alternative to seq" is a separate topic.
If you have aversion to $PERL, perhaps do them without using
anything what is not expected to be built-in in modern shells,
perhaps like this?
t/test-lib-functions.sh | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/t/test-lib-functions.sh b/t/test-lib-functions.sh
index 8d99eb3..4edddac 100644
--- a/t/test-lib-functions.sh
+++ b/t/test-lib-functions.sh
@@ -739,7 +739,12 @@ test_seq () {
2) ;;
*) error "bug in the test script: not 1 or 2 parameters to
test_seq" ;;
esac
- perl -le 'print for $ARGV[0]..$ARGV[1]' -- "$@"
+ test_seq_counter__=$1
+ while test "$test_seq_counter__" -le $2
+ do
+ echo "$test_seq_counter__"
+ test_seq_counter__=$((test_seq_counter__ + 1))
+ done
}
# This function can be used to schedule some commands to be run
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
