On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 09:33:06AM -0800, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote: > git supports using git+ssh:// and ssh+git:// instead of ssh:// or the > rsync-style format. The first two are however not documented in the > git-clone manage as acceptable protocols (which is what I think of as > the canonical source for what you can use). There are tests to make > sure these are supported, but even the commit that allows for this > (c05186cc; Support git+ssh:// and ssh+git:// URL) makes it pretty > clear it’s not something that’s considered sensible.
Hrm. I tried to find more discussion on the list, but I couldn't find any mention of git+ssh, nor of that patch. I wonder if there is a hole in my archive, or if they were done off-list for some reason. Anyway... > But in either case, if we’re going to support it, it should be > documented. If we don’t want to support it, then we should delete the > references to these formats along with the tests for this. Whether they are stupid or not (and I agree that they are), we cannot just rip them out now without warning. And given that they are probably not costing us a lot in maintenance burden to keep, I'd guess it is less effort to simply leave them in place. I suspect they were not really documented because nobody wanted to encourage their use. I don't think it would be wrong to document that they exist and are deprecated, though. > I’m happy to write a patch going in either direction, but I’d like > some input from the community as to what we want to do. I imagine your ulterior motive is also figuring out whether libgit2 needs to support them? -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
