Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes: > I think having both is bad as it may contradict each other? > What is supposed to happen here: > > [submodule "frotz"] > group = default > > [submoduleGroup "default"] > member = !:frotz
What is supposed to happen is that you will write code to diagnose this as an error, and give helpful error message to the user. > So groups of groups, we discovered recursion today. :) > Having this discussion makes me realize, the groups handling logic > will be more complex than I anticipated for the first RFC patch series. That is why I think we do not have to have a very complex group logic from day one. > The two basic questions the logic has to answer is: > * Give me all the submodules that fit these specifiers (i.e. the > --init-submodules collection from clone) > * Given submodule X, does it fit the specifier ( a new uninitialized > submodule during a later update) Yes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
