René Scharfe <l....@web.de> writes:

> Use the variable branch_name, which already has "refs/heads/" removed,
> instead of blindly advancing in the ->branch string by 11 bytes.  This
> is safer and less magical.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l....@web.de>
> ---
>  wt-status.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/wt-status.c b/wt-status.c
> index e206cc9..42ea15e 100644
> --- a/wt-status.c
> +++ b/wt-status.c
> @@ -1656,7 +1656,7 @@ static void wt_shortstatus_print_tracking(struct 
> wt_status *s)
>       if (starts_with(branch_name, "refs/heads/"))
>               branch_name += 11;
>  
> -     branch = branch_get(s->branch + 11);
> +     branch = branch_get(branch_name);

Is this correct?  s->branch is the refname that is l10n independent;
branch_name is the localized variant for human consumption.

>       color_fprintf(s->fp, branch_color_local, "%s", branch_name);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to