On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:02:36PM +0200, Beat Bolli wrote: > On 29.08.14 20:59, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> +# ISO strict date format > >> +test_expect_success 'ISO and ISO-strict date formats display the same > >> values' ' > >> + git log --format=%ai%n%ci | sed -e "s/ /T/; s/ //; s/..\$/:&/" > >> >expected && > >> + git log --format=%aI%n%cI >actual && > >> + test_cmp expected actual > >> +' > > > > This is saying that as long as --date=iso-strict format is > > bug-to-bug compatible with --date=iso format it is OK. > > > > Which is fine, especially knowing the implementation ;-) > > > > Yeah, I wasn't sure how to test this, since the commit dates change with > each test run. Maybe it's the easy way out, but on the other hand it's > better than no test at all. Check the known parts with a regex?
If you use test_tick (or test_commit, which calls it), the timestamps are stable from run to run of the tests. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
