On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 04:45:47PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:30:36PM +0200, Per Cederqvist wrote:
...
> > - Changed behavior: by default, guilt no longer changes branch when
> > you push a patch. You need to do "git config guilt.reusebranch
> > false" to re-enable that. This patch sets the default value of
> > guilt.reusebranch to true; it should in my opinion change to false
> > a year or two after the next release.
>
> We've been living with the "origin" -> "guilt/origin" branch change
> for a year already, and in fact, these days I've gotten used to the
> new behavior. Is it really worth it to change the default?
So, at first I was skeptical about the branch name prefix change. I've used
it for about a year now, and I love it. When I first read Per's idea to
change the default to the old-style, I was a bit sad but I understand the
motivation.
I'm open to either mode being the default since it's easy enough for me to
change it for me (thanks, ~/.gitconfig) but I think more people should
benefit from the added safety against accidental git-push. (I also like
being able to use guilt/master..master to get only the commits I care
about.) Thoughts?
Jeff.
--
Intellectuals solve problems; geniuses prevent them
- Albert Einstein
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
