On 02/28/2014 01:40 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Duy Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> done_pbase_paths_num++;
>>
>> If you move this up one line, then you don't have to "+ 1" in ALLOC_GROW
>>
>
> same comment to a few other patches. The rest of your series looks good.
Duy,
The example in Documentation/technical/api-allocation-growing.txt does
it the same way as Dmitry:
ALLOC_GROW(item, nr + 1, alloc);
item[nr++] = value you like;
The alternative,
nr++;
ALLOC_GROW(item, nr, alloc);
item[nr] = value you like;
is an extra line, which is at least a small argument for the variant
shown in the docs. (Since ALLOC_GROW is a macro, it is not OK to use
"++nr" as its second argument.) Personally, I also prefer the shorter
version. The line
item[nr++] = value
is an easy-to-recognize idiom, and
ALLOC_GROW(item, nr + 1, alloc);
somehow makes it more transparent by how much more space will be needed.
So my vote is that the patches are OK the way Dmitry wrote them (mind, I
have only read through 05/11 so far).
Michael
--
Michael Haggerty
[email protected]
http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
