Hi Saravanan, On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 08:43:34PM +0000, Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi) wrote: > > Based on a previous thread “First Git status takes 40+ minutes, when mounting > fileystem/diskimage with 50G GIT repo + 900G of builds articles” > > The context is that > 1. git wokspace was clone(50G) > 2. some 30 platorms build(900G) > 3. This tree was then copied into a new diskimage/filesystem + git > update-index --refresh" was done to update the index to the new filesystem, > then frozen. > 4. New workspaces created by cloning this frozen diskimage(< 30 seconds) > 5. This diskimage was mounted on a new machine > 6. A file was modified and "git add/commit" was done > > I have done “git update-index –refresh”, in the mounted filesystem, as above > This has improved “git status/diff” timing from 40+ minutes to 1.5 minutes > for the first time and <5 seconds for subsequent calls. > > But "git commit -m "dummy commit" of a 1 line change in 1 file takes about > 5-6 minutes, everytime in this workspace. > Tracing shows a whole bunch. The entire 5-6 minutes worth of the following > sort of trace logs. > 3:13:50.320930 trace git-lfs: filepathfilter: rejecting "x/y/z.o.command" via > [] > 13:13:50.320940 trace git-lfs: filepathfilter: accepting " x/y/z.o.command " > 13:13:50.320862 trace git-lfs: filepathfilter: rejecting "a/b/c/d.o.command" > via [] > 13:13:50.320972 trace git-lfs: filepathfilter: accepting " a/b/c/d..o.command" > > Does anyone have any insights on what could be causing this?
These are messages from the Git LFS tool, and this list does not provide support for Git LFS, since it is a separate project not affiliated with Git. I would recommend that you create an issue on Git LFS's tracker at: https://github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs/issues/new and mention that you are seeing lots of 'filepathfilter' logs. My speculation is that this could be a slowdown in the 'filepathfilter' code paths, or an entire-tree scan where 'filepathfilter' is invoked every so often. I'd mention both of those as possibilities (or send a link to this email on public-inbox), and see if anything comes up. > On the other hand, if I had > > Thanks, > Sarvi > Occam’s Razor Rules Thanks, Taylor
