Jeff King <[email protected]> writes: > I think it might be worth just eliminating the whole idea.
I kinda like the simplification ;-) An even thinner wrapper that calls malloc() and dies if it gets NULL, without any "try-to-free" logic.
Jeff King <[email protected]> writes: > I think it might be worth just eliminating the whole idea.
I kinda like the simplification ;-) An even thinner wrapper that calls malloc() and dies if it gets NULL, without any "try-to-free" logic.