Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > ... > At which point I do wonder if this is better handled by a wrapper > process which simply reaps everything. And indeed, people have already > come up with similar solutions for containers: > > https://github.com/Yelp/dumb-init > > So I dunno. I am not really opposed to this patch, as it is just adding > some extra cleanup. But it seems like it is really hitting the tip of > the iceberg, and I'm not sure it's an iceberg I'd like to get to the > bottom of.
Thanks for stating what I had on mind a lot better than I said ;-)
