On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 02:37:48PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > William Hubbs <[email protected]> writes: > > > I am writing back onn this thread because I'm not quite sure of the > > status. v5 of the patch seemed ok, but there were some changes discussed > > that would have created a v6. The v6 changes though were never really > > clear. I'm not sure whether I am supposed to be doing something more or > > whether I'm waiting for you. ;-) > > > > Can you write back and let me know? > > In general, unless I ask you to wait, a contributor would almost > never be waiting for me. > > I think Ævar's v6 was not up to par, but I thought that v5 from you > (which is in 'next') was good enough to cook in 'next'. The topic > will not be moving out of 'next' until the final 2.21 is released > anyway, so if anything, I'd say the ball is in his court to update > his version after the release, when your v5 may have a chance to be > kicked out of 'next' and replaced _if_ there is a better version by > then.
Thanks much for the update. I didn't realize that v5 was in next. William
