On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 7:43 PM Derrick Stolee <[email protected]> wrote: > 2. Number of other commit tag-lines (Reviewed-By, Helped-By, > Reported-By, etc.). > > Using git repo: > > $ git log --since=2018-01-01 junio/next|grep by:|grep -v > Signed-off-by:|sort|uniq -c|sort -nr|head -n 20 > > 66 Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <[email protected]> > 22 Reviewed-by: Jeff King <[email protected]> > 19 Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <[email protected]> > 12 Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <[email protected]> > 11 Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> > 9 Helped-by: Jeff King <[email protected]> > 8 Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <[email protected]> > 7 Reported-by: Ramsay Jones <[email protected]> > 7 Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <[email protected]> > 7 Acked-by: Brandon Williams <[email protected]> > 6 Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <[email protected]> > 6 Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <[email protected]> > 5 Mentored-by: Christian Couder <[email protected]> > 5 Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <[email protected]> > 4 Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <[email protected]> > 4 Reviewed-by: Johannes Schindelin <[email protected]> > 4 Helped-by: Stefan Beller <[email protected]> > 4 Helped-by: René Scharfe <[email protected]> > 3 Reviewed-by: Martin Ågren <[email protected]> > 3 Reviewed-by: Lars Schneider <[email protected]> > > (There does not appear to be enough density here to make a useful > metric.)
If your database keeps mail relationship (e.g. what mail is replied to what according to In-Reply-To header) then look for mail replies to patches. I think we have a rough picture who are active reviewers with that. -- Duy
