Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes: > Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > >> I think I'd agree on it being a release blocker. Given that your fix is >> really a one-liner (3 of the lines are just changing the variable name, >> which I agree with), I'd be fine with applying it on top rather than >> reverting the original, even if it means delaying the release slightly. >> It seems like about the same amount of risk to me. > > Yeah, I would say we should just apply the rfc/patch as-is directly > on 'master'.
... which just has happened. Thanks.
