On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> writes: > >> I think the documentation >> >> ~/.gitconfig >> User-specific configuration file. Also called "global" >> configuration file. >> >> should be clarified --- e.g. it could say >> >> $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/git/config >> ~/.gitconfig >> User-specific configuration files. Because options in >> these files are not specific to any repository, thes >> are sometimes called global configuration files. > > Yeah, I think that makes sense. > >> As for "git config --global", I think the best thing would be to split >> it into two options: something like "git config --user" and "git >> config --xdg-user". That way, it is unambiguous which configuration >> file the user intends to inspect or modify. When a user calls "git >> config --global" and both files exist, it could warn that the command >> is ambiguous. >> >> Thoughts? > > I actually thought that the plan was "you either have this, or the > other one, never both at the same time" (and I think those who > pushed the XDG thing in to the system made us favor it over the > traditional one). So as long as --global updates the one that > exists, and updates XDG one when both or neither do, I think we > should be OK. And from that viewpoint, we definitely do not want > two kinds of --global to pretend as if we support use of both at the > same time. >
It appears that we actually prefer ~/.gitconfig rather than XDG_CONFIG_HOME.. And at least based on current cursory testing on the command line, we do both read and write to the proper location, assuming that ~/.gitconfig is preferred over $XDG_CONFIG_HOME. Thanks, Jake
