Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> writes:
> Phillip Wood <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> From: Phillip Wood <[email protected]>
>>
>> I've updated these based on the feedback for v2. I've dropped the
>> patch that stopped print_commit_summary() from dying as I think it is
>> better to die than return an error (see the commit message of the
>> patch that adds print_commit_summary() for the reasoning). Apart from
>> that they're minor changes - style fixes and a reworded a commit message.
>
> Thanks for further polishing this topic; I found nothing in the
> update that was questionable. Will replace.
>
> With this, perhaps it is ready for 'next'?
Not really. I needed at least this to get it even compile, which
hints that I do not yet know what _else_ I missed by skimming this
round of the series.
sequencer.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
index 37460db6b1..63cfb6ddd9 100644
--- a/sequencer.c
+++ b/sequencer.c
@@ -1139,8 +1139,8 @@ static int do_commit(const char *msg_file, const char
*author,
unlink(git_path_cherry_pick_head());
unlink(git_path_merge_msg());
if (!is_rebase_i(opts))
- res = print_commit_summary(NULL, &oid,
- SUMMARY_SHOW_AUTHOR_DATE);
+ print_commit_summary(NULL, &oid,
+ SUMMARY_SHOW_AUTHOR_DATE);
return res;
}
}
--
2.15.0-372-g9a6f8facfd