Brandon Williams <bmw...@google.com> writes: > + if (flags) > + rev.diffopt.flags = diff_flags_or(&rev.diffopt.flags, flags);
If we are avoiding from passing a struct (even if it is a small one) by value, then returning a struct as value defeats the point of the exercise, I would think. If that will be the calling cconvention, making diff_flags_or(&a, &b) to update &a by or'ing bits in &b would be more natural. Having said that, as I said in a separate message, as long as we have this _or() thing, no sane person would add anything but bitfields to the structure which will guarantee that it will stay to be small set of flags and nothing else---so I personally am fine with pass by value (which in turn makes it OK to return as a value, too). Other than that, this step looked reasonable to me. Thanks.
