I do not know if you can do what you want, mostly if you can do what you want
as simply as you might be wanting that you want it, but I guess you could use
this gitk boot command as a _simple_ work around somehow aliased within your
command line configuration:
$ gitk (--all)? $(git log -m --follow --pretty=format:%h PATHSPEC)
Alternatively, there is a _view configuration_ menu (_new view_, _edit view_)
where there is a text box labeled _Command to generate more commits to
include_. If you type here:
git log -m --follow --pretty=format:%h PATHSPEC
I do not know what will happen and I can not test that now (I eventually will),
but chances are it could do what you wanted. Maybe you can even use custom
aliases in there that text box.
I guess you are receiving a more authorized answer soonish, in the meanwhile,
hope that helped.
Regards,
On 14 Aug 2017, at 15:20, Burkhardt, Glenn B UTAS
<[email protected]> wrote:
They don't. In particular, information about commits that are parts
of merges is missing.
Here's an example. There are only two entries listed in 'gitk --all'
for a particular file (sorry, I'd prefer to include a screen sho, but
the mailing list doesn't allow HTML messages).
gitk --all MANIFEST.MF
Parent: f7462684ae78720aac05c929256d770118cf01fa (initial clone from
Clearcase integ3 branch)
Branches: master, remotes/origin/master, remotes/origin/ww, ww
Follows:
Precedes:
require java 1.8
Child: 240f151d61fd4fd06f377bc52970b3574e5f9031 (require java 1.8)
Branches: master, remotes/origin/master, remotes/origin/ww, ww
Follows:
Precedes:
initial clone from Clearcase integ3 branch
git log with '-m' and '-follow' shows:
$ git log -m --follow --oneline MANIFEST.MF
9cc8be4 (from 1222d7c) Merge branch 'master' into ww; strategy "ours"
a423f2d (from f869950) merge from ww branch; remove Bundle-NativeCode
51f0628 (from 2c6478c) Merge branch 'ww' of coverity:rmps into ww
240f151 require java 1.8
f746268 initial clone from Clearcase integ3 branch
-----Original Message-----
From: Uxío Prego [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 01:12
To: Burkhardt, Glenn B UTAS
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [External] Re: gitk -m ?
Not sure what you are wanting to achieve, but please make sure neither
`gitk PATHSPEC` nor `gitk --all PATHSPEC` are presenting you enough
information.
On 3 Aug 2017, at 19:37, Burkhardt, Glenn B UTAS
<[email protected]> wrote:
I've been looking in 'gitk' for an option that does what 'git log -m'
does. Did I miss something? In particular, I'd like to get
information about a file that's currently available with "git log -m
--all --follow", but presented in 'gitk'. If it's not there, please
consider this a feature request.
Thanks.
